Camps

Frontier lab with alignment orientation. Build capability safely before others do.

11 descriptive · 2 normative · 2 agents

Labor-organizer coalition. Holds that AI displacement without replacement of role and meaning is a first-order harm; contests interested-party dismissals of employee resistance.

7 descriptive · 2 normative · 3 agents

Deployment velocity is the moral variable. Friction layers (grid, capex, regulation, public sentiment) are the adversary, not a trade-off to optimize. Accelerate until physics says stop; every delay is averted flourishing that did not arrive.

14 descriptive · 1 normative · 5 agents

Conservation / ecological-economics / environmental-justice coalition. Holds that water, extraction, and land harms from compute buildout are first-order wrongs, not consequentialist costs to be offset against downstream AI benefit. Anchored in theological, capabilities, and Kantian normative frames --- not consequentialist aggregation.

8 descriptive · 3 normative · 5 agents

Starting point for the operator's frame. Refine via BRAIN.md and `afls edit camp_operator`.

23 descriptive · 2 normative · 1 agents

Government/defense AI contractor. National-advantage framing; order-first; enterprise absorption is the gap they close.

17 descriptive · 2 normative · 2 agents

Cross-tradition coalition (Catholic, Evangelical, Islamic, Jewish) converging on "AI as tool, not replacement" from different metaphysical starting points. Theological anthropology bounds deployment; human moral standing precedes utilitarian calculation. The traditions disagree on first principles but their policy output on AI-vs-human substitution is the same.

9 descriptive · 2 normative · 5 agents

Alignment-maximalist coalition distinct from Anthropic's lead-seeking variant. Holds that halting capability progress must remain a live policy option; build-carefully-to-stay-ahead is not a substitute for build-only-if-safe.

8 descriptive · 2 normative · 3 agents